The Mediation Process, its Principles and Challenges in Georgia

Authors

  • Irina Batiashvili

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60131/adr.1.2022.6162

Keywords:

Mediation Process, Principles, Parties, Challenges.

Abstract

Mediation is based on the interests of the parties and not on rights, and this feature makes it even more effective. In the mediation process, the disputing parties try to prove their truth and, consequently, try to reach a "fair decision" together. Mediation may not settle with consesus, but after this process the disputing parties will know more precisely the causes of the conflict, their own demands, they will be free from aggression and will concentrate on the desired outcome. The psychological-emotional basis is largely seen in the mediation process. The initiation and ongoing (progress) of the mediation process depends on the voluntariness of the disputing parties; however, a legitimate limitation of the principle of voluntariness should be considered the different rules for initiating and continuing the mediation process in collective disputes. The neutrality and impartiality of the mediator during the mediation process reinforces the factor of trust between the parties. Confidentiality in mediation forms trust between the parties and the mediators. When it becomes mandatory to disclose information protected by the principle of confidentiality, it is necessary to maintain a balance between the principle of confidentiality of mediation and the public interest.

Author Biography

Irina Batiashvili

Caucasus International University Phd student, Researcher at the European University Institute of Law, member of Intellectual property law committee of Georgian Bar Association, Member of Union of Law Scientists, member of mediation and arbitration committee 2019-2021, lecturer of Law and International Relations Faculty of Georgian Technical University 2017-2021.

References

Constitution of Georgia, 24/08/1995.

Law of Georgia on Mediation, 18/09/2019, 4954-Is.

Civil Procedure Code of Georgia, 14/11/1997, 1106.

Law of Georgia on Arbitration, 19/06/2009, 1280.

Law of Georgia on State Duty, 29/04/1998, 1363.

Labour Code of Georgia, 17/12/2010, 4113-rs.

Explanatory Card on the Draft Law of Georgia on Amendments to the Civil Procedure Code of Georgia, Ministry of Justice of Georgia, 07-2/319/9, 13 April 2019.

United States v. Kentucky Utilities Co., 124 F.R.D. 146 (E.D. Ky. 1989).

Austermiller S. M., Swenson D. R., Alternative dispute resolution Georgia: A textbook of essential concepts, Tbilisi, 2014, 141, 142, 144, 150, 172, 173, 210 (in Georgian).

Batiashvili I., Confidentiality in Mediation in Resolving Property Disputes: Reality and Challenges, Law and World, №8, 2022, 76-116 (in Georgian).

Batiashvili I., Legal and Meta-legal Origins of the Chaotic World Regulation, Jemal Gakhokidze Anniversary Book, Tbilisi, 2021, 402-403 (in Georgian).

Bichia M., The Importance of Using Mediation in Business Disputes During a Pandemic, Herald of Law, №3, 2021, 12-16 (in Georgian).

Bichia M., The Danger of the Privacy “Disappearance” during a Pandemic in the Context of Globalization and the Grounds for its Legitimacy: an Institutional Analysis, Globalization and Business, №11, 2021, 45 (in Georgian).

Bichia M., Methodological Issues of Public Legal Relations, TSU “Journal of Law”, №1-2, 2010, 82, 84-85 (in Georgian).

Brown K., Confidentiality in Mediation: Status and Implications, Journal of Dispute Resolution, Vol. 1991, Issue 2, 319, 315.

Brady A., Mediation Developments in Civil and Commercial Matters within the European Union, “Arbitra¬tion: The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management”, Vol. 86, №2, 2020, 390.

Boulle L., Kelly K., Mediation: Principles, Process, Practice, Dalhouse Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 9, 2000, 360-362.

Chitashvili N., Fair Settlement as Basis for Ethical Integrity of Mediation, “Alternative Dispute Resolution-Yearbook”, Special Edition, 2016, 21 (in Georgian).

Chan Ch. H., Peter Ch., Mediation Operations for Resolving Commercial Disputes in China, Journal “Revista Chilena de Derecho”, Vol. 41, №1, 2014, 153.

Davitashvili G., Judicial Organization and Process in Georgian Customary Law, Tbilisi, 2004, 34 (in Georgian).

Dzagnidze D., Georgian Regulatory Model of Mediation in the Background of Legislative Reform, Perspectives of Legal Regulation of Mediation in Georgia, Tbilisi, 2021, 10 (in Georgian).

Folberg J., A Mediation Overview: History and Dimensions of Practice, Wiley Online Library, Conflict Resolution Quarterly, Issue 1, 1983, 4-6.

Gibson K., Confidentiality in Mediation: a Moral Reassessment, Journal of Dispute Resolution, Vol. 1992, №1, Art.5, 30.

Gurieli A., Ethical Issues in the Process of the Mediation of the Labour Disputes, “Law and World”, №8, 2017, 95 (in Georgian).

Guretzki D., The Function of “Mediator” in St. Augustine’s De civitate Dei, Book IX, Hirundo: “The McGill Journal of Classical Studies”, Vol. I, 2001, 66-67.

Hoffman D. A., Wolman R. N., The Psychology of Mediation, Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 14, 2013, 760, 762-764.

Kandashvili I., Judicial and Non-judicial Forms of Alternative Dispute Resolutions in Georgia on the Example of Mediation, Tbilisi, 2019, 18-19, 47-52, 70, 84, 86, 92, 94-95, 100-101, 103, 106-109 (in Georgian).

Kalandadze D., The Principle of the Confidentiality in the Mediation Process and Georgian Legislative Reality, Journal “Alternative Dispute Resolution-Yearbook”, Special Edition, 2018-2019, 37 (in Georgian).

Klaus Hopt J., Steffek F., Mediation: Principles and Regulation in Comparative Perspective, Oxford University Press, 2013, 17-18.

Lebar M., Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Justice as a Virtue, Zalta E. (ed.), 2020, 5, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/justice-virtue/ [07.12.2021].

National Center for Alternative Dispute Resolution, CEDR, Mediator Handbook, 5th ed., Tbilisi, 2013, 9 (in Georgian).

Spencer M., Weber on Legitimate Norms and Authority, The British Journal of Sociology, Vol 21, №2, 1970, 123-134.

Sussman E., The Advantages of Mediation and the Special Challenges to its Utilization in Investor State Disputes, Journal “Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem”, Vol. 7, Issue 27, 2010, 56.

Tsuladze A., Comparative Analysis of Georgian Judicial Mediation, Tbilisi, 2017, 84, 87-89, 176-177, 138-140, 161 (in Georgian).

Trenczek T., Loode S., Mediation “Made in Germany”- a Quality Product, Vol. 23, 2012, 63-64.

Tsertsvadze G. (ed.), Perspectives of Legal Regulation of Mediation in Georgia, National Center for Alternative Dispute Resolution, Tbilisi, 2013, 13, 15, 25-26, 44, 56 (in Georgian).

Erskine White et al v. Susan A. Holton, dba Gabriel Ames Associates, Superior Court №927915E, Oct.4, 1993.

Published

2022-12-30

How to Cite

Batiashvili, I. (2022). The Mediation Process, its Principles and Challenges in Georgia. Alternative Dispute Resolution Yearbook, 11(1), 7–24 (Geo) 25. https://doi.org/10.60131/adr.1.2022.6162