Confidentiality of the Mediation Process and Ethical Dilemmas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60131/adr.1.2023.7081Keywords:
Mediation, Confidentiality, Neutrality, Fairness, Ethical dilemmas, Grounds for Restrictions.Abstract
Scientific research is dedicated to the protection of the legal foundations of Confidentiality in the process of mediation and ethical dilemmas. The paper discusses the negative and positive aspects of mediation confidentiality, the importance of confidentiality protection.
In addition, the purpose of the study is to first determine the specifics of the national model regarding the confidentiality of mediation, and then to define the approaches of international acts on the confidentiality of the mediation process, the legislative regulation of different countries (Germany, Austria, etc.). The study is based on the concept that confidentiality is an integral part and the main principle of mediation that stimulates certain positive aspects (sincerity of the parties, fairness of the agreement, neutrality of the mediator, effectiveness of mediation, etc.). Accordingly, the paper emphasizes that there is a logical chain between these factors. Confidentiality connects these circumstances with one another and plays a central role in mediation.
At the same time, protecting Confidentiality increases the risk of damaging the public interest. However, in parallel with the protection of Confidentiality, the principles of legality and fairness should not be violated while ensuring that the public interest is protected. The activity of the mediator also requires the resolution of ethical dilemmas, which involves a thorough study of each case and taking into account specific circumstances. Accordingly, each case should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, and it must be determined to what extent another value may override the interest of protecting Confidentiality in mediation.
Here, the article also deals with the legal grounds for limitation of Confidentiality, in the presence of which the invasion in Confidentiality can be considered legitimate. Determining the legitimacy of violation and restriction of confidentiality is important for distribution of the burden of proof between the parties. Simple, understandable and clearly outlining the grounds for confidentiality restriction is essential to assess this issue correctly. This is even more relevant for the Georgian model, which envisages a fairly wide range of confidentiality restrictions on the one hand, and requires the observance of proportionality, on the other hand. In this reality, the mediator should try to find a golden mean in his activities so that the protection of one value does not lead to an unreasonable encroachment of another value.
References
Constitution of Georgia, Legislative Gazette of Georgia, 31-33, 24/08/1995.
Law of Georgia on Mediation, ssm. 18/09/2019, №4954-Iს.
Civil Procedure Code of Georgia, ssm, 14/11/1997, №1106-Iს.
Code of the Rights of the Child, paragraph “h” of Article 3, 20/09/2019, №5004-Iს.
Code of professional ethics of mediators of the Association of Mediators of Georgia, 24/04/2021.
Batiashvili I., Confidentiality in Mediation in Resolving Property Disputes: Reality and Challenges, “Law and World”, №21, 2022, 104-106, 109-110 (in Georgian).
Bichia M., The Importance of Using Mediation in Business Disputes During a Pandemic, “Herald of Law”, №3, 2021, 12 (in Georgian).
Bichia M., The Legal Regime and the Importance of Protecting Confidentiality in the Mediation Process, “Law and World”, №15, 2020, 198, 201 (in Georgian).
Bichia M., Structural analysis of Article 181 of the Civil Code of Georgia, Journal “Justice and Law”, №1, 2020, 52, 58. (in Georgian).
Bichia M., The problem of civil legal protection of personal data in the Internet Universe, Proceedings of the VIII International Scientific and Practical Conference "Internet and Society", Kutaisi, 2017, 35-40 (in Georgian).
Gallwas H.-U., The general conflict between rights of informational self-determination and freedom of information, Bichia M. (Translator), “Modern Legal Review”, №1(3), 2015, 70-73 (in Georgian).
Eloshvili N., Importance of Confidentiality Principle in Mediation Process, “Alternative Dispute Resolution – Yearbook”, 2013, 15 (in Georgian).
Tvauri R., Standard of Limits of Confidentiality Principle in Mediation, “Alternative Dispute Resolution Yearbook”, 2015, 27 (in Georgian).
Kakoishvili D., Ethical obligations of a mediator in the process of mediation, Tb., 2020, 6 (in Georgian).
Kalandadze D., The principle of the confidentiality in the mediation process and Georgian legislative reality, "Alternative Dispute Resolution - Yearbook", 2018-2019, Special Issue, 2019, 36 (in Georgian).
Meiss Reinhard W. Von, The Sphere of Personal Secrecy and its protection in Procedural Actions, Georgian Translation, Bichia M. (translator), Tb., 2014, 49-50 (in Georgian).
Maisuradze T., Principles of Self-determination and Confidentiality in the Ensuring Process of Mediation Ethics Strength, "Alternative Dispute Resolution - Yearbook", special edition, 2018-2019, 2019, 174 (in Georgian).
Shalikashvili Sh., Criminal, criminological and psychological aspects of the program of divergence and mediation of minors, Tb., 2013, 41 (in Georgian).
Chitashvili N., Framework for regulation of Mediation ethics and Targets of of ethical Binding, “Journal of Law”, №1, 2016, 27, 35 (in Georgian).
Chitashvili N., Fair Settlement as Basis for Ethical Integrity of Mediation, Journal “Alternative Dispute Resolution - Yearbook 2016”, TSU publishing, 2017, 21-22 (in Georgian).
Tsertsvadze G., Mediation, Alternative Form of Dispute Resolution (General Review), Tb., 2010, 48 (in Georgian).
Tsertsvadze G. (ed.), Prospects for legal regulation of mediation in Georgia, vol. 2013, 25, 29, 31-32 (in Georgian).
Kandashvili I., Mediation (an effective alternative way to resolve disputes), Tb., 2020, 96, 135-136 (in Georgian).
Zhorzholiani L., The principle of confidentiality in the process of considering and resolving a collective labor dispute through mediation, "Alternative Dispute Resolution - Yearbook", 2018-2019, Tb., 2019, 217 (in Georgian).
Decision of the Constitutional Court of Georgia, dated June 26, 2012, №3/1/512 in the case of Danish Citizen Heike Kronquist v. Parliament of Georgia, II-60 (in Georgian).
Decision of the Constitutional Court of Georgia, dated December 25, 2020, №2/2/1276 in the case of Giorgi Keburia vs. the Parliament of Georgia (in Georgian).
Decision of the Chamber for Civil Cases of the Supreme Court of Georgia, №as-1155-1101-2014, dated May 4, 2015 (in Georgian).
Article 7, directive 2008/52/EC of European Parliament and of the Council, 21 May 2008, https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eudr/2008/52/article/7[15.12.2022].
Article 6, UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW (UNCITRAL) Mediation Rules, 2021, https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/22-01369_mediation_rules_ebook_1.pdf [09.01.2023].
Directive 2008/52/EC of European Parliament and of the Council, 21 May 2008, https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eudr/2008/52/article/7 [15.12.2022].
Mediation Act, 31 August 2015 (Federal Law Gazette I p. 1474, https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_mediationsg/englisch_mediationsg.pdf [04.01.2023].
UNCITRAL Model Law on international Commercial Conciliation with Guide to Enactment and Use 2002. United Nations, New York, 2004, p. 27.
Mediation At of Bulgaria, State Gazette No. 110/17.12.2004, https://www.uv.es/medarb/observatorio/leyes-mediacion/europa-resto/bulgaria-mediation-act-2004.pdf [24.12.2022].
Alfini J. J., Mediation Theory and Practice, 2d ed. 2006, 133, 205-206.
Arthur K. J., Confidentiality and privilege in mediation, Australian Alternative Dispute Resolution Law Bulletin, November 2015, 91.
Boulle, L., Nesic, M., Mediation. Principles, Process, Practice. London et al.: Butterworths, 2001, 296-297.
Burns R.P., Some Ethical Issues Surrounding Mediation, Fordham Law Review, Vol. 70, Issue 3, 2001, 702.
Bush Robert A. Baruch, Study of ethical Dilemmas and Policy Implications, A, Journal of Dispute Resolution, Iss. 1, Vol. 1994, 14, 16-17, 18.
Callahan R., Mediation Confidentiality: For California Litigants, Why Should Mediation Confi¬dentiality be a Function of the Court in Which the Litigation is Pending? Vol. 12, Iss. 1, 2013, 65.
Deason E. E., The Quest for Uniformity in Mediation Confidentiality: Foolish Consistency or Crucial Predictability? Marquette Law Review, Vol. 85, 2001, 80.
Deason E. E., Predictable Mediation Confidentiality in the U.S. Federal System, Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, Vol. 17, №2, 2002, 240, 245-246.
Dursun, A. L., The Principle of Confidentiality in Mediation and the Role of Confidentiality in Commercial Mediation, Afro Eurasian Studies Journal, Vol. 6, Iss. 1-2, 2017, 23.
Field R, Wood N., Marketing Mediation ethically: The case of Confidentiality, Field & Wood, 2005,146.
Freedman L. R., Prigoff M. L., Confidentiality in Mediation: The Need for Protection, Journal of Dispute Resolution, Vol. 2, Iss. 1, 1986, 37-38. 45.
Furlan F., Blumstein E., Hofstein N. D., Ethical Guidelines for Attorney Mediators: Are Attorneys Bound by Ethical Codes for Lawyers When Acting as Mediators? Vol. 14, 1997, 3.
Gallwas H.-U., Der allgemeine Konflikt zwischen dem Recht auf informationelle Selbstbestimmung und der Informationsfreiheit, In: Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 45, Jahrgang, Heft 44, 1992, 2787-2788.
Gibson K., Confidentiality in Mediation: A Moral Reassessment, Journal of Dispute Resolution, Iss.1, Vol. 1992, 34.
Govori Z., Confidentiality under the ICC Mediation Rules compared to the LCIA Mediation Rules, International Hellenic University, 2016, 7.
Hardy S., Rundle O., Mediation for Lawyers, Australia, 2010, 192-193.
Hedeen T., Coercion and Self-determination in Court-Connected Mediation: All Mediations are voluntary, but some are more voluntary than others, The Justice System Journal, Vol. 26, No.3, 2005, 284.
Hoffman A. D., Wolman N. R., The Psychology of Mediation, Cardozo J. of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 14, 2013, 806.
Hueso L. C., Confidencialidad y protección de datos en la mediación en la Unión Europea, Revista IUS, Vol. 12, №41, 2018, 336-338 (in Spanish).
Izumi L. C., La Rue C. H., Prohibiting "Good Faith Reports" Under the Uniform Mediation Act: Keeping the Adjudication Camel out of the Mediation Tent, Journal of Dispute Resolution, №1, Vol. 2003, 86.
Irvine M., Serving Two Masters: The Obligation Under the Rules of Professional Conduct to Report Attorney Misconduct in a Confidential Mediation, RUTGERS Law Journal, Vol. 26, 1994, 158.
Johnson D. P. Jr, Confidentiality in Mediation: What Can Florida Glean from the Uniform Mediation Act? Florida State University Law Review, Vol. 30, №3, 2003, 489, 492.
Kirtley A., Mediation Privilege's Transition from Theory to Implementation: Designing a Mediation Privilege Standard to Protect Mediation Designing a Mediation Privilege Standard to Protect Mediation Participants, the Process and the Public Interest, The Participants, the Process and the Public Interest, The, Journal of Dispute Resolution, Vol. 1995, №1, 9-10, 48.
Meiss Reinhard W. von, Die Persönliche Geheimsphäre und deren Schutz im prozessualen Verfahren, Diessenhofen, 1975, 33-34, 177-178 (in German).
Morek R., Nihil silentio utilius: Confidentiality in mediation and its legal safeguards in the EU Member States, Era Forum, Vol. 14, №3, 2013, 431-432.
Nadja M. A., International and Comparative Mediation: Legal Perspectives, “Kluwer Law International”, 2009, 248-249.
Nolan-Haley J., Mediation: The “New Arbitration”, Harvard Negotiation Law Review, Vol. 17, 2012, 73.
Noone M. A., Ojelabi A. L., Ethical Challenges for Mediators around the Globe: An Australian Perspective, Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, Vol. 45, 2014,169.
Oberman S., Confidentiality in Mediation: An Application of the Right to Privacy, Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2012, 548.
Otis L., Rousseau-Saine C., The Mediator and ethical Dilemmas: A proposed Framework for Reflection, Journal of Arbitration and Mediation, Vol. 4, №2, 2014, 46.
Pattenden R., The Law of Professional – Client confidentiality, Regulating the Disclosure of Confidential Personal Information, Oxford, 2003,12.
Perkowski M., Implications of Arbitration and Mediation Implementation from the perspective of Bialystok, Optimum Economic Studies, №5 (83), 2016, 153.
Rabe C. S., Wode M., Mediation, Grundlagen, Methoden, rechtlicher Rahmen, 2. Auflage, Berlin, 2020, 25.
Rausch M., The Uniform Mediation Act, Ohio State Journal Dispute Resolution, Vol. 18, №2, 2003, 603, 608.
Reichert K., Confidentiality in international Mediation, Dispute Resolution Journal, Vol. 59, №4, 2004, 62;
Relationship Between Mediation and Attorney Malpractice and Other Misconduct, 45 Cal. L. Revision Comm’n Reports 19, 2017, 53-54, http://clrc.ca.gov/pub/Printed-Reports/Pub240-K402.pdf [05.01.2023].
Rosenberg P. J., Keeping the Lid on Confidentiality: Mediation Privilege and Conflict of Laws, Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, Vol. 10, Iss. 1, 1994, 159-160.
Scheutzow O. S., Gillis L. S., Confidentiality and Privilege of Peer Review Information: More Imagined Than Real, Journal of Law and Health, Vol. 7, 1993, 179.
Shapira O., Conceptions and Perceptions of Fairness in Mediation, South Texas Law Review, Vol. 54, 2012, 340.
Schepard A., An Introduction to the Model Standards of Practice for Family and Divorce Mediation, Family Law Quarterly, Vol. 35, No.1, 2001, 18-19.
Stipanowich T., Why Businesses Need Mediation, Legal Studies Research Paper Series, 2004, 14.
Tetunic L. F., Act Deux: Confidentiality after the Florida Mediation Confidentiality and Privilege Act, Nova Law Review, Vol. 36, Iss. 1, 2011, 82-83, 94-95.
Waldman E. (editor), Mediation Ethics, Cases and Commentaries, Unites States of America, 2011, 2-3, 14, 87.
Weinberg O., Weinberg B., Is there absolute Confidentiality in Mediation? Toronto Law Journal, 2019, 2.
Werthwein S., Das Persönlichkeitsrecht im Privatrecht der VR China, Berlin, 2009, 65-68, 165 (in German).
Widman M. S., The Protections and Limits of Confidentiality in Mediation, Alternatives, Vol. 24, №10, 2006, 167.
Wolski B., Confidentiality and Privilege in Mediation: Concepts in need of Better Regulation and Explanation, UNSW Law Journal, Vol. 43(4), 2020, 1561-1562.
Clark v. School Board Country, Florida, No. 3:09-cv-901-J-34TEM, October 13, 2010, WL 4696063.
Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California, No. 23042, Supreme court of California, July 1, 1976, at 334, https://law.justia.com/cases/california/supreme-court/3d/17/425.html [15.01.2023].
Union Carbide Canada Inc. v. Bombardier Inc., 05.08.2014 SCC 35.
Vitakis-Valchine v. Valchine, 793 So. 2d 1094 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).
Vitakis-Valchine v. Valchine, 923 So.2d 511 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).
Tapoohi v Lewenberg (No 2), 21/10/2003, VSC 410.
