Court Mediation as a Means of Access to Justice and a Prerequisite for the Development of Private Mediation

Authors

  • Nino Kharitonashvili

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60131/adr.1.2023.7082

Keywords:

Mediation, conciliation, arbitration.

Abstract

Today, due to the diversity of public relations, the problem with overloading courts is stated all over the world. For the effectiveness of justice, countries are introducing alternative means of dispute resolution and promoting development. A number of substantive and procedural advantages of alternative mechanisms to resolve disputes are recognized in practice and theory.

The aim of the paper is to share the experience of foreign countries with Georgian readers, including critical opinions which is essential for the proper promotion of alternative mechanisms to resolve disputes and develop legal policy in this field. The paper briefly reviews the main problems of dispute resolution by judicial and non-judicial methods, and the introduction of the institution of preliminary conciliation is proposed as a solution.

Author Biography

Nino Kharitonashvili

Doctor of Law, associate professor of Guram Tavartkiladze Tbilisi University, Caucasus University and Alte University.

References

Abedian H., Judicial Review of Arbitral Awards in International Arbitration – A Case for an Efficient Sytstem of Judicial Review, Vol. 28, Issue #6, 2011, 553, https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Journal+of+International+Arbitration/28.6/JOIA2011044 [29.05.2023].

Association Agreement Between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and Their Member States, of the One Part, and Georgia, of the Other Part, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/agree_internation/2014/494/2021-06-17 [29.05.2023].

Baril M.B., Dickey, D., MED-ARB: The Best of Both Worlds or Just A Limited ADR Option?, 2014, 1.

Dodson S., Klebba J.M., Global Civil Procedure Trends in the Twenty-First Century, Rev. 1, 2011, 18.

Eliantonio M., Backes Ch.W., Van Rhee C.H., Spronken T.N.B.M., Berlee A., Standing Up for Your Right(s) in Europe, 2012, 13, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=IPOL-JURI_ET%282012%29462478 [29.05.2023].

Guarnieri C., Pederzoli P., The power of judges: a Comparative Study of Courts and Democracy, Oxford University Press, 2002, 3, http://link.library.eui.eu/portal/The-power-of-judges--a-comparative-study-of/7sQRr3Lt8cs/ [29.05.2023].

Kandashvili I., Judicial and Non-judicial Forms of Alternative Dispute Resolution on the Example of Mediation in Georgia, Tbilisi, 2018, 65, http://press.tsu.ge/data/image_db_innova/Kandashvili%20Irakli.pdf [29.05.2023] (in Georgian).

Kharitonashvili N., Notary Law, ‘’Bona Causa’’ Publishing House, Tbilisi, 2021, 274 (in Georgian).

Kharitonashvili N., Comparative civil process, "Bona Causa", 2022, 163 (in Georgian).

Silvestri E., Too much of a Good Thing: Alternative Dispute Resolution in Italy, 2017, 79, https://www.academia.edu/36857715/Too_much_of_a_good_thing_Alternative_Dispute_Resolution_in_Italy [29.05.2023].

Tkemaladze S., Mediation in Georgia: from Tradition to Modernity, 2016, 10, (in Georgian) https://www.ge.undp.org/content/georgia/ka/home/library/democratic_governance/mediation_in_georgia_2016.html [29.05.2023].

Tsertsvadze G., Prerequisites of international arbitration, Tbilisi, 2008, 23, (in Georgian) http://press.tsu.ge/data/image_db_innova/Disertaciebi/giorgi_cercaze.pdf [29.05.2023].

Van Rhee C.H., Verkerk R., Civil Procedure, Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, 2012, 143, https://www.academia.edu/18369806/CIVIL_PROCEDURE_Elgar_Encyclopedia_of_Comparative_Law_Second_Edition_2012_p_140_156?auto=download [29.05.2023].

Zappalaglio A., Recent Developments Concerning Mandatory Mediation in Italy: Some Comments on a Troubled History, 2013, 3, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2478268 [29.05.2023].

Carver Th.N., Essays in Social Justice. Harvard University Press. 2013, 3, https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674287907 [29.05.2023].

Elnegahy Sh., Can Mediation Deliver Justice? Vol. 18, 2017, 766, https://www.cardozojcr.com/s/CAC305_crop.pdf [29.05.2023].

Matteucci G., Mandatory Mediation, the Italian Experience, Vol. 16, 2015, 189, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286409655_MANDATORY_MEDIATION_THE_ITALIAN_EXPERIENCE [29.05.2023].

Silvestri E., Too much of a Good Thing: Alternative Dispute Resolution in Italy, 2017, 79, https://www.academia.edu/36857715/Too_much_of_a_good_thing_Alternative_Dispute_Resolution_in_Italy [29.05.2023].

Taelman P., Stefaan V., Belgian Mediation Report, 2013, 1, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2355902 [29.05.2023].

The Power of Judges: a Comparative Study of Courts and Democracy, Oxford University Press, New York, 2022, http://link.library.eui.eu/portal/The-power-of-judges--a-comparative-study-of/7sQRr3Lt8cs/ [29.05. 2023].

Decision of the European Court of Human Rights of January 17, 2017 in case No. 30459/13, http://www.supremecourt.ge/files/upload-file/pdf/kobeliani-saqartvelos-winaagmdeg.pdf [15.06.2023].

Decision of the Constitutional Court of Georgia of February 7, 2020 on case No. 1481, https://constcourt.ge/ka/judicial-acts?legal=9023 [30.05.2023].

Decision of the First Collegium of the Constitutional Court of Georgia on February 16, 2004 in case No. 1/1/186.

Published

2023-10-17

How to Cite

Kharitonashvili, N. (2023). Court Mediation as a Means of Access to Justice and a Prerequisite for the Development of Private Mediation. Alternative Dispute Resolution Yearbook, 12(1), 68–81 (Geo) 82. https://doi.org/10.60131/adr.1.2023.7082