Domestic and International Legal Frameworks for the Enforcement of Mediation Settlement Agreements

Ketevani Dalbashvili

doi:10.60131/adr.1.2025.11067

Authors

Ketevani Dalbashvili Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60131/adr.1.2025.11067

Keywords:

Mediation, Enforcement of Mediation Settlement Agreements, legislative amendment, Hybrid Models.

Abstract

The article examines mediation as a modern and non-confrontational mechanism[1] of conflict management[2], the effectiveness of which significantly depends on the legal guarantees for the enforcement of mediation settlements. This study aims to provide a systematic analysis and evaluation of the legal mechanisms for enforcing mediation agreements in Georgia and in international practice.

Furthermore, the present study reflects the legislative amendments adopted on 9 December 2025 to the Law of Georgia on Mediation (hereinafter – the Law) and to Chapter XLIV¹³ of the Civil Procedure Code of Georgia (hereinafter – the Code), within the framework of which two fundamental dimensions of mediation were substantially modified: (a) the legal regime governing the enforcement of private and court-annexed mediated settlement agreements; and (b) the institutional mechanisms relating to mediators’ professional ethics and disciplinary responsibility.

Although this reform represents a new stage in the institutional development of mediation in Georgia - aimed at harmonising the mediation framework with international standards and strengthening professional regulation - it is also accompanied by certain theoretical and practical challenges. In particular, under the new wording of Article 208(1) of the Code, according to which a settlement agreement reached through court mediation is approved by the court in the same ruling, it remains unclear whether such a mediated settlement is subject to automatic enforcement without an additional application by the parties, and whether this could be regarded as a limitation of one of the fundamental principles of mediation, namely the principle of voluntariness.

The article examines the role of the Singapore Convention in facilitating the enforcement of settlement agreements reached through international mediation and assesses its impact across European, Asian, and Anglo-American legal systems. Comparative analysis highlights key challenges and approaches for strengthening the reliability and standards of enforcing mediated settlements.

It also offers recommendations to enhance the transparency, efficiency, and credibility of mediation at both national and international levels, including clarifying judicial discretion in enforcement refusals, defining essential settlement requirements, integrating hybrid mediation models, and harmonizing international enforcement practices. In light of recent legislative amendments, the paper further proposes an interpretative approach to distinguish the enforcement regimes applicable to settlements reached through private and court-annexed mediation.

[1] Kriesberg L., Northrup T. A., Northrup, Constructive Conflicts: From Escalation to Resolution, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2017, 2.

[2] Roberts M., Mediation in Family Disputes: Principles of Practice. Ashgate Publishing, 2008, 229.

Author Biography

Ketevani Dalbashvili, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University

Master of Laws, Participant of the Adaptation Program of the Bar Association, Graduate of the Mediator Certification Program.

References

Bibliography:

1. Singapore Convention, 7 August 2019.

2. UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Mediation and International Settlement Agreements resulting from Mediation, 2018.

3. Directive 2008/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008.

4. Civil Procedure Code of Georgia, 14/11/1997, №1106-IIს.

5. Law of Georgia “On Mediation”, 18/09/2019, № 4954-Iს.

6. Alternative Dispute Resolution Act of 2004, Republic Act No. 9285 (Philippines), Section 17.

7. Commercial Mediation Act, 2010, S.O. 2010, c. 16, Sched. 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6128(10)70082-3

8. Law No. 192/2006 on mediation and the organization of the mediator profession.

9. Mediationsgesetz (MediationsG) vom 21. Juli 2012 (BGBl. I S. 1577).

10. Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of thr Council of 12 December 2012.

11. Abed A.Z., The Role of Arbitration and Mediation in Resolving International Trade Disputes, Utu Journal of Legal Studies (UJLS), 2024, Vol. 1, No. 1, 10–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57238/ujls.4cq6r976

12. Abramson H., Med-Arb: An Ethical Hybrid or Conflict in Process?, Florida State University Law Review, Vol. 27, 2000, 101–109.

13. Adeishvili I., Barnabishvili G., Bichia M., Gatserelia A., Gersamia N., Dughvashvili S., Egnatashvili D., Todua U., Imnaishvili T., Kikilashvili G., Sikharulidze T., Tkemaladze S., Kandashvili I., Chachava S., Chachanidze E., Chitashvili N., Khurtsidze A., Jorbenadze S., Commentary on the Law of Georgia on Mediation, Kandashvili I. (ed.), Universali Publishing, Tbilisi, 2024, 38–42, 52–53 (in Georgian).

14. Administrative Chamber of the Supreme Court of Georgia, Decision of 13 May 2022, Case No. ბს-1014(კ-20) (in Georgian).

15. Akhtar N., Alternative Dispute Resolution: Concept, Criticism and Future of Arbitration and Mediation, Global Legal Studies Review, 2023, 38–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2023(VIII-II).05

16. Akobia T., Legislative Guarantees for the Enforcement of Private Mediation Settlements: A Comparison Between EU Member States and Georgian Legislation, Annual Review 2021, TSU Publishing, 87–88 (in Georgian).

17. Alexander N., Campbell-Ross N. (eds.), The Singapore Convention: A Commentary, Kluwer Law International, 2020, 55–71.

18. Alexander N., Chong S., Giorgadze V., The Singapore Convention on Mediation: A Commentary, 2022, 16–20.

19. Alexander N., International and Comparative Mediation: Legal Perspectives, Kluwer Law International, 2009, 180–182.

20. Alexander N., Ong Z.M., The Singapore Convention on Mediation: A Commentary, Wolters Kluwer, 2020, 45–47.

21. Anderson D.Q., The Singapore Convention on Mediation: Supplying the Missing Piece of the Puzzle for Dispute Resolution, Asian Journal of International Law, 2020, 7.

22. Andrews N., Fundamental Principles of Civil Procedure: Order Out of Chaos, Intersentia Publishing, 2008, Chapter 2, 23.

23. Andrews N., The Modern Civil Process: Judicial and Alternative Forms of Dispute Resolution, Cambridge University Press, 2008, 251–253.

24. Azar E. E., Protracted Social Conflict: An Analytical Framework in The Management of Protracted Social Conflict Theory and Cases, Dartmouth Publishing Company, 1990, 1.

25. Barnabishvili G., Tsiklauri S., The Issue of Enforcement of Mediation Settlements in Georgia, Journal “Alternative Dispute Resolution – Annual Review 2017”, Special Edition, TSU Publishing, 2018, 7 (in Georgian).

26. Berkoff L.A., Kline C.L., Falk T.N., Mediation Matters: The Use of Mediation in Large Chapter 11 Cases, 2023, 62.

27. Berman G.A., The Singapore Convention: Enhancing the Enforceability of International Mediated Settlement Agreements, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 57, No. 3, 2019, 823–827.

28. Bormann J., The German Enforceable Notarial Act in Cross-Border Cases, Intersentia Publishing, 2022, 51–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18690/lexonomica.14.1.49-72.2022

29. Born G.B., International Commercial Arbitration, Kluwer Law International, 2014, 288.

30. Bungenberg M., Koevski G., Böhme B., Kocev L., Fröhlich M., Zdraveva N., Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Western Balkans: Trends and Challenges, Springer, 2024, 108–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76345-8

31. Burr A., International Mediation and Arbitration: A Practical Guide, Oxford University Press, 2017, 85–88.

32. Bush R.A.B., Folger J.P., The Promise of Mediation: Responding to Conflict Through Empowerment and Recognition, Jossey-Bass, 1994, 23, 50, 70–75, 80–85.

33. Butlien R., The Singapore Convention on Mediation: A Brave New World for International Commercial Mediation, Dispute Resolution Journal, 2020, 190.

34. Carbonneau T.E., The Law and Practice of Arbitration, Aria, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2006, 20–25.

35. Chanturia L., Introduction to the General Part of Georgian Civil Law, “Law” Publishing, Tbilisi, 1997, 351–357 (in Georgian).

36. Chitashvili N., A Fair Agreement as the Basis for Ethical Integrity in Mediation, Journal “Alternative Dispute Resolution – Annual Review 2016”, TSU Publishing, 2016, 13–14.

37. Chitashvili N., The Limits of Regulating Mediation Ethics and the Addressees Bound by Ethical Standards, “Law Journal”, TSU Publishing, No. 1, 2016, 48–49 (in Georgian).

38. Chochishvili M., The Issue of Enforcement of Mediation Settlements, “Alternative Dispute Resolution – Annual Review 2020”, TSU Publishing, 2020, 88 (in Georgian).

39. Chua E., Enforcement of International Mediated Settlement Agreements, Singapore Management University, 2019, 15–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/AIAJ2019001

40. Chua E., Enforcement of International Mediated Settlements Without the Singapore Convention on Mediation, Singapore Management University, 2019, 574–579.

41. Chua E., The Singapore Convention on Mediation and the New York Convention on Arbitration: Comparing Enforcement Mechanisms and Drawing Lessons for Asia, Asian International Arbitration Journal, 2020, Vol. 16, No. 2, 113–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/AIAJ2020018

42. Cooks L.M., Hale C.L., The Construction of Ethics in Mediation, 12 Mediation Q. 55, 1994, 62.

43. De Palo G., et al., Achieving a Balanced Relationship Between Mediation and Judicial Proceedings, European Parliament, 2014, 26–30.

44. De Palo G., Trevor M.B., EU Mediation Law and Practice, Oxford University Press, 2012, 88–89, 103.

45. Deason E.E., Enforcing Mediated Settlement Agreements: Contract Law Collides with Confidentiality, 35 U.C. Davis L. Rev., 2001, 14–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.270349

46. El Siddik A., Enforceability of the Mediation Outcome, Murdoch University eLaw Journal, Vol. 17, Issue 2, 2010, 21.

47. Fach Gómez K., The Role of Mediation in International Commercial Disputes, Oxford University Press, 2019, 4–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198827955.003.0001

48. Fentiman R., International Commercial Litigation, Oxford University Press, 2015, 80–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198712916.001.0001

49. Fisher R., Ury W., Patton B., Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In, Random House Business Books, 1991, 6–8, 15–17.

50. Fraidenburg M., Teale T., The Art of Mediation – Key Skills for New Mediators, 2024, 30–34.

51. Gilles P., Judicial Review of Mediated Settlements in Germany, 16 German Law Journal 23, 2015, 30–32.

52. Goldberg S., Sander F., Rogers N., Cole S., Dispute Resolution: Negotiation, Mediation, Arbitration, and Other Processes, 7th ed., Aspen Publishers, 2015, 120–123, 125–130, 151–156.

53. Gurieli A., The Relationship Between Judicial and Non-Judicial Mediation, the Need to Distinguish Court Mediation Forms in Georgia, and Judicial Authority in Conducting Each Form, Journal Law and the World, No. 12, Tbilisi, 2019, 44 (in Georgian).

54. Hoffman D.A., Bringing Peace into the Room: How the Personal Qualities of the Mediator Impact the Process of Conflict Resolution, 2003, 13–14.

55. Jacqueline M., Judicial Review of Mediated Settlement Agreements: Improving Mediation with Consent, 5 Y.B. Arb. & Mediation 152, 2013, 153–154.

56. Kandashvili I., Judicial and Non-Judicial Forms of Alternative Dispute Resolution Based on the Example of Georgian Mediation, 2018, 72–73 (in Georgian).

57. Kandashvili I., Mediation and the Innovative Form of Alternative Dispute Resolution – Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), “Law Journal”, TSU Publishing, No. 1, 2018, 100–101 (in Georgian).

58. Kandashvili I., Mediation as an Effective Alternative Means of Dispute Resolution, “Jurists’ World” Publishing, Tbilisi, 2020, 280 (in Georgian).

59. Kantaria G., The Legal Regime for the Enforcement of Judicial and Private Mediation Settlements, Journal “Alternative Dispute Resolution – Annual Review 2023”, Special Edition, TSU Publishing, 2023, 22 (in Georgian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.60131/adr.2.2023.7713

60. Law Reform Commission, Alternative Dispute Resolution: Mediation and Conciliation, Ireland, 2010, 67–68.

61. Leda M. Cooks, Hale C.L., The Construction of Ethics in Mediation, 12 Mediation Q. 55, 1994, 62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.3900120106

62. Lerman L., Schneider A.K., Mediation: Law, Policy, and Practice, Aspen Publishers, 2021, 300–305.

63. Levin J., The Singapore Convention on Mediation: A Commentary, Arbitration International, Vol. 35, Issue 3, 2019, 373–376.

64. Lim L.C., Tan A., The Singapore Convention on Mediation: A Commentary, Kluwer Law International B.V., 2019, 15–20.

65. Lipartia N., Grounds for Refusing Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards with Regard to Public Order, in: Zurab Akhvlediani 80 (eds. Dzlierishvili Z., Kavtaradze S.), Tbilisi, 2013, 131–132 (in Georgian).

66. Logvynenko M., Mediation in the Notary: Harmonious Resolution of Legal Disputes, Scientific Journal of Polonia University, Vol. 62, 2024, 188–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23856/6224

67. Lu Y., Med-Arb and Arb-Med: A Law and Economic Analysis, Journal of Dispute Resolution, 2022, 267–268.

68. Mackie S., Enforcement of Mediated Settlement Agreements in England and Wales, 27 ADR Bulletin 2, 2016, 40–42.

69. Manetska K., Enforceability of Mediation Settlement Agreements: Ukrainian Perspective in the Light of Current Trends, 2019, 85.

70. Mayer B.S., The Dynamics of Conflict Resolution: A Practitioner’s Guide, 2000, 145–148.

71. Menkel-Meadow C., Dispute Resolution: Beyond the Adversarial Model, West Academic, 2005, 250–253.

72. Menkel-Meadow C., Love L.P., Schneider A.K., Mediation: Practice, Policy, and Ethics, Aspen Publishing, 2022, 20–24.

73. Meskhi¬shvili K., Current Issues of Private Law: Theory and Judicial Practice, Volume I, Tbilisi, 2020, 206 (in Georgian).

74. Moore C.W., Spencer L.K., The Mediation Process: Practical Strategies for Resolving Conflict, 2015, 15.

75. Moore C.W., The Mediation Process: Practical Strategies for Resolving Conflict, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 2004, 11–13.

76. Mshvildadze T., The Role of the Mediator at the Final Stage of Mediation, Journal “Alternative Dispute Resolution – Annual Review 2020”, Special Edition, TSU Publishing, 2020, 67 (in Georgian).

77. Natadze A., Surguladze T., Ghonghadze N., Tsorikishvili N., Wit De Haag J., Training Manual on Enforcement Law, German Society for International Cooperation (GIZ), Tbilisi, 2020, 9, 17–19 (in Georgian).

78. Nolan-Haley J.M., Judicial Review of Mediated Settlement Agreements: Improving Mediation with Consent, Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 2013, 1, 5–7, 10–12.

79. Nylund A., Ervasti K., Adrian L. (eds.), Nordic Mediation Research, Springer Open, 2017, 86–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73019-6

80. Panjikidze N., Review of Certain Ethical Obligations of Lawyers as Representatives in Mediation Proceedings, Journal “Alternative Dispute Resolution – Annual Review 2023”, Special Edition, TSU Publishing, 2020, 181–182 (in Georgian).

81. Pesudovs A., The Civil Procedure Principles as the Essential Basis for Undisputed Enforcement of Obligations, Rīga Stradiņš University, 2018, 9–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185101011

82. Raz J., The Authority of Law: Essays on Law, Clarendon Press, 1979, 43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198253457.001.0001

83. Rhee C.H. van, Verkerk R., Civil Litigation in China and Europe: Essays on the Role of the Judge and the Parties, 2014, 283–284.

84. Riskin L.L., Mediator Orientations, Strategies and Techniques, Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation, Vol. 12, No. 1, 1994, 111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/alt.3810120904

85. Santiago F., Law Enforcement to Mediation, 2017, 15.

86. Schlaich L., The Singapore Convention on Mediation: A Global Impact Assessment, Hart Publishing, 2022, 75–77.

87. Schultz T., Ortino F. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Arbitration and Mediation, Oxford University Press, 2020, 500–505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198796190.001.0001

88. Schultz T., Stirnimann F.X. (eds.), International Commercial Arbitration and Mediation: A Comparative Guide, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020, 11–15.

89. Shestowsky D.E., Dispute Resolution and Decision Making: How the Process Influences Outcomes, Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2007, 10–14.

90. Spencer D., Brogan M., Mediation Law and Practice, Cambridge University Press, 2006, 12–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811005

91. Stipanowich T.J., Lempert R.O., Resolving Disputes: Theory, Practice, and Law, Aspen Publishing, 2018, 450–452.

92. Stipanowich T.J., Multi-Tier Commercial Dispute Resolution Processes in the United States, Legal Studies Research Paper Series, 2020, 8–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108854306.011

93. Strong S., Enforcing International Commercial Mediation Agreements as Judgments or Arbitration Awards, 22 Harv. Negot. L. Rev., 2016, 49–51.

94. Strong S.I., Realizing Rights Through Mediation?, Cambridge University Press, 2017, 112–115.

95. Susmann E., The Final Step: Issues in Enforcing the Mediation Settlement Agreement, Newsletter of the Mediation Committee of the International Bar Association, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2006, 2.

96. Sussman E., The New York Convention Through a Mediation Prism, American Review of International Arbitration, Vol. 20, No. 3–4, 2009, 1–2.

97. Tan D., The Singapore Convention on Mediation to Reinforce the Status of International Mediated Settlement Agreement: Breakthrough or Redundancy?, Journal of International Dispute Resolution, 2023, 15–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21377

98. Tsercvadze G., Arevadze M., Vasadze E., Tvauri R., Ivanidze G., Makhauri P., Jijia-shvili T., Takashvili S., Khuchua T., Jibladze B., Perspectives on the Legal Regulation of Mediation in Georgia, Tsercvadze G. (ed.), National Center for Alternative Dispute Resolution, Tbilisi, 2013, 164 (in Georgian).

99. Tsuladze A., The Georgian Model of Court Mediation Through a Euro-American Lens, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, 2016, 28 (in Georgian).

100. Tsuri M., The Art of Drafting Mediation Settlement Acts: Instructional Guide, Journal “Alternative Dispute Resolution – Annual Review 2012”, TSU Publishing, 140–141.

101. Tsuvina T., Ferz S., Tvaronavičienė A., Riener P., The Implementation of Consensual Tenet in Modern Civil Procedure: Comparative Analysis of Court-Connected Settlement Procedures Applied in Austria, Lithuania, and Ukraine, European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance, Vol. 9, Issue 1, 2022, 33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-7.1-a000109

102. Van den Berg A.J., The New York Arbitration Convention of 1958: An Analytical Commentary, Kluwer Law International, 1981, 1–4.

103. Wagner G., Mediation im Wirtschaftsrecht, 2012, 100–105.

104. Wheeler M., What’s Fair? Ethics for Negotiators, Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School, 2004, 16–20.

105. Winkler J., Die vollstreckbare Ausfertigung in der notariellen Praxis, Bonner Rechtsjournal, 2016, 118.

106. Wolff R., The Singapore Convention on Mediation: A Commentary, 2020, 49–52.

107. Zeller B., Trakmany L., Mediation and Arbitration: The Process of Enforcement, Uniform Law Review, 2019, 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3407699

108. Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Georgia, Decision of 5 March 2025, Case No. ას-1404-2024 (in Georgian).

109. Constitutional Court of Georgia, Decision No. 1/2/596, Citizen Natia Qipshidze v. Parliament of Georgia, 30 September 2016 (in Georgian).

110. Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy, [1999] ECHR (No. 22764/93), October 26, 1999.

111. Hornsby v. Greece, [1996] ECHR (No. 18357/91), March 19, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1127/njgpm/1996/1996/91

112. https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2019/08/31/the-singapore-mediation-convention-what-does-it-mean-for-arbitration-and-the-future-of-dispute-resolution/ [16.06.2025]

113. https://blog.cpradr.org/tag/report-on-international-mediation-and-enforcement-mechanisms/ [16.06.2025]

114. https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/convention_kat [16.06.2025]

115. https://www.ejiltalk.org/a-new-legal-framework-for-the-enforcement-of-settlement-agreements-reached-through-international-mediation-uncitral-concludes-negotiations-on-convention-and-draft-model-law/ [16.06.2025]

116. https://fl.sg/resource/what-is-arb-med-arb/ [16.06.2025]

117. https://imimediation.org/2022/01/17/georgia-ratifies-the-singapore-convention/ [16.06.2025]

118. https://journal.arbitration.ru/analytics/the-singapore-convention-on-mediation-an-overview/ [16.06.2025]

119. https://mediators.ge/ka/article/mediaciis-shesaxeb-saqartvelos-kanonshi-dargis-shemdgomi-ganvitarebistvis-umnishvnelovanesi-cvlilebi-xorcieldeba/577 [16.06.2025].