Competence of Arbitration and National Courts to Apply Arbitral Interim Measures
Keywords:
Interim Measure in Arbitration, Arbitral Tribunal, National Courts, Competence of the Arbitral Tribunal and National Courts, International Competence of Georgian Courts.Abstract
The paper discusses one of the crucial institutes of arbitration proceedings - interim measures and related thereto aspects. Subject to analysis is the competence of arbitral tribunal and court of law in ordering interim measures in arbitration and the grounds for restriction of their powers.
The paper also offers the review of the evolution of the institute of interim measure and modern international trends. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of the efficiency of interim measures applied by court of law and arbitral tribunal.
References
Law of Georgia on Arbitration, 02.07.2009.
Civil Procedure Code of Georgia, 14.11.1997.
Arbitration Rules of Tbilisi Arbitration Institute, 2017.
Arbitration Rules of Tbilisi Arbitration Chamber, 2010.
Arbitration Rules of Dispute Resolution Center (DRC).
Explanatory note of draft law on the Law of Georgia on Arbitration.
UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, 1985.
UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, 1985 with amendments as adopted in 2006.
Civil Procedure Code of Italy.
China Law on Arbitration.
Swiss International Privat Law.
English Arbitration Act, 1996.
ICC International Arbitration Rules.
Abascal J.M., The Art of Interim Measure, ICCA Congress Series N 13, General editor Berg Albert Jan van den Berg, 2006, 558-575.
Binder P.M, Comments on the Law of Georgia on Arbitration, Georgian Law Review, №10/2007-2/3, 2007, 182-202.
Blackarby N. Partasides C. Redfern A. Hunter M., Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration, Oxford ed., 2015, 445.
Born G.B., International Arbitration: Law and Practice, 2012, 203-213.
Born G.B., International Commercial Arbitration, Vol. II, 2009, 1949-1951, 1965, 1970, 2049, 2051, 2066.
Lew J.D.M., Mistelis L.A., Kroll S.M., Comparative International Commercial Arbitration, Kluwer Law International, 2003, 588.
Moses M.L., The Principal and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration, 2nd ed., 2012, 105-106.
Rosenne S., Provisional Measures in International Law: The international Court of Justice and The International Tribunal of the Law of Seas, 2005.
Segesser G., Kurth Ch., Interim Measure, International Arbitration in Switzerland, A Handbook for Practitioners, Edited by Gabrielle Kaufmann-Kohler and Blaise Stucki, 2004, 71.
Tserstvadze G., Brief Commentary to the Georgian Arbitration Law 2009, Tbilisi, 2011, 142.
Order of Kutaisi Court of Appeals dated 09.10.2017, Case №2b-985.
Order of Kutaisi Court of Appeals dated 16.11.2016, Case №2/b-1085-2016.
Order of Supreme Court of Georgia dated 09.07.2014, Case №A-544-შ-17-2014
Order of Kutaisi Court of Appeals dated 29.07.2013, Case №2/b-674-2013.
Order of Supreme Court of Georgia 03.07.2013, Case №AS-538-511-2013.
Order of Supreme Court of Georgia dated 27.05.2007, Case №ას-827-1190-06.
Van Uden BV v. Kommanditgesellschaft in Firma Deco-Line, C – 391/95 (1998).
www.npc.gov.cn/englishnpc/Law/2007-12/12/content_1383756.htmz.
www.iccwbo.org/media-wall/news-speeches/icc-announces-2017-figures-confirming-global-reach-leading-position-complex-high-value-disputes/.
http://www.sccinstitute.com/statistics/.
www.jus.uio.no/lm/italy.arbitration/818.html.
